Case 4105016/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105016/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss A Fraser v Represented by Mr W J Craig,15 Kincardine & Mearns CAB Skye Highland Adventures Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105016/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105016/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss A Fraser
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Aberdeen, with Employment Judge J M Hendry sitting alone, issued judgment after oral reasons were given at the hearing on 21 November 2022. The respondent, Skye Highland Adventures Ltd, was ordered to pay Miss A Fraser £3,250 for unpaid wages for May and June 2022, £28.70 for mileage incurred in the performance of her duties, and £350 for 3.5 days' holiday accrued during her employment but unpaid.
The extracted written judgment records the dispositive orders only and does not set out further written findings or legal analysis. On the face of the order, the claimant's monetary claims succeeded in full, with a total award of £3,628.70.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unpaid wages for May and June 2022. | Upheld | — | £3,250 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for mileage incurred in performance of duties, calculated at 252 miles at 45p per mile. | Upheld | — | £29 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 3.5 days' holiday accrued in the course of employment but unpaid. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,629
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.