Case 4105029/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105029/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr G McDonald v Represented by Mr W J Craig,15 Kincardine & Mearns CAB Skye Highland Adventures Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105029/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry Dated
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105029/2022 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr G McDonald
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal accepted Mr McDonald's evidence as credible and reliable. It found that he had been engaged as an Activity Guide on a salary of £24,000 per year, started work on 1 May 2022, and signed a written contract before commencing employment. It accepted that he was not told in advance that the first month would be unpaid, and that the later WhatsApp messages from Mr Brady supported the claimant's account that wages would be paid.
On the wages issue, the tribunal held that Skye Highland Adventures Ltd had no right to withhold payment or to deduct training costs from wages. It found there had been no agreement for repayment of training costs, no written authority to make a deduction, and no contractual basis for recoupment. Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid wages and awarded £4,000 for May and June 2022.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's entitlement to reimbursement of mileage costs, awarding £54.45, and to accrued holiday pay, awarding £350. It rejected other heads of claim, including an uplift under the ACAS Code and further damages-style claims, on the basis that the Code did not apply because this was not a dismissal and that the tribunal had no power to award those additional sums.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued holiday pay at the date of termination. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held there was no right to withhold wages or deduct training costs, and no written authority under s.13 ERA 1996 to make such deductions. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Breach of contract | Award for mileage incurred on behalf of the business; the tribunal found the claimant was entitled to reimbursement after being asked to use and claim for vehicle mileage. | Upheld | — | £54 |
| Other | The tribunal rejected an uplift under the ACAS Code and other damages-style heads of claim, saying the Code did not apply because this was not a dismissal and the tribunal had no power to award those sums. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,404
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.