Case 4105053/2017 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Mr M Friel (Deceased) v Next of kin Newlands Roofing Company Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105053/2017
- Decision date
- 3 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Mr M Friel (Deceased)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Glasgow before Employment Judge Ms M Robison, held that the respondent should pay the claimant redundancy pay of £4,440. The claimant was Mr M Friel (deceased), represented by his sister and next of kin, Ms Bridget Friel. The respondent did not appear.
The tribunal also dealt with claims for notice pay and holiday pay. Both were dismissed because they had been lodged outwith the three month time limit from the date of termination of employment.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, whistleblowing, or other statutory claims were recorded in the judgment. The decision records a single monetary award for redundancy pay and no separate remedy for the dismissed notice pay and holiday pay claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,440 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was dismissed because it had been lodged outwith the three month time limit from the date of termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed because it had been lodged outwith the three month time limit from the date of termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,440
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.