Case 4105077/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105077/2016 , 4105078/2016 & 4105079/2016 Mr L Ashcroft v Mr C Slater Mr C Brenna The Kilmarnock Football Club Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105077/2016
- Decision date
- 9 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105077/2016 , 4105078/2016 & 4105079/2016 Mr L Ashcroft
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case numbers 4105077/2016, 4105078/2016 and 4105079/2016, the judgment records that the claim brought by Mr L Ashcroft, Mr C Slater and Mr C Brenna against The Kilmarnock Football Club Ltd had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Because the claim had been withdrawn, Employment Judge Claire McManus dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no findings on the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.