Case 4105089/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tomasz Blawicki v Williamson Design Florist Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4105089/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Young
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tomasz Blawicki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Tomasz Blawicki claimed unpaid wages and holiday pay, saying he had been short of pay for February, March and April 2020 and seeking financial compensation. The respondent disputed the claim, saying he had been dismissed on 16 March 2020 for gross misconduct, that April and May 2020 payments had been made by mistake, and that the claim was out of time. The tribunal noted substantial factual disputes about when the claimant stopped working and when the relevant sums fell due, but it did not resolve those disputes because the threshold issue was time bar.
The tribunal held that, on the claimant's own evidence, his last day of employment was no later than 30 April 2020, and even on the most favourable view for him the last relevant payment date was 11 May 2020. The ACAS early conciliation notification was not received until 11 August 2020 and the tribunal claim was not presented until 24 September 2020, so the claim fell outside the three-month time limits under section 23 ERA 1996 and Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994. The tribunal also found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. It accepted that the claimant knew he had a right to complain, had sought advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau, and had not shown any illness or disability that prevented him from bringing the claim. Any incorrect advice about time limits did not displace the late presentation. The complaints of deduction from wages, including holiday pay, and breach of contract were therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay under section 23 ERA 1996 was held to be out of time and outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994 was also held to be out of time and outside jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- reasonably practicable
- Asda Stores Limited v Kauser
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.