Case 4105089/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Beattie and others (per attached schedule) v D M Design Bedrooms Limited (In Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105089/2024
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Beattie and others (per attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim on the available material under rule 21 because no response was presented within the applicable time limit. It recorded that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation, but that the relevant court had granted permission on 04 October 2024 for the proceedings to continue. The judge was satisfied that the claimants were entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives, and the claimants were employees dismissed as redundant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 default judgment on a complaint that the respondent failed to comply with s.188 and/or s.188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and made a protective award; the judgment does not specify a monetary amount in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.