Case 4105093/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Carroll v Represented by: Ms S Shiels - Solicitor Dumfries & Galloway Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105093/2016
- Decision date
- 6 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Carroll
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing, Mr Carroll's claims of breach of contract and unfair dismissal succeeded. The respondents then sought reconsideration at a hearing in Glasgow on 11 October 2018, and Employment Judge Laura Doherty confirmed the original decision on 24 October 2018, with the judgment entered on 6 November 2018.
On the first reconsideration ground, the respondents argued that the compensation should have been reduced to reflect contractual sick pay during long-term absence. The tribunal rejected that submission because it had already found, in the original reasons, that Mr Carroll's ill-health resulted from actions taken by the employer and was not a supervening event. On that basis, Wood v Mitchell SA Ltd did not require a different approach to loss.
On the second ground, the respondents contended that pension loss should have ended when future earnings loss was assessed to end. The tribunal rejected that argument as well. It held that it had not found Mr Carroll would necessarily be in the same pension position in alternative employment, and there was no evidence to support a finding that pension loss and earnings loss had to end at the same time. The tribunal referred to Aegon UK Corp Services Ltd v Roberts and the 2017 pension loss principles, but confirmed the original pension assessment.
The original remedy included past loss, future loss, loss of statutory rights and pension loss. The compensatory award was recorded as £211,383.81 before reductions, and the later appeal record states that after Polkey and contributory conduct reductions and the statutory cap the final award was £50,321.75.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Successful breach-of-contract claim. The reconsideration decision confirms the original award, but the accessible text does not state a separate monetary figure for this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Successful unfair dismissal claim. The reconsideration application challenged the compensation and pension-loss approach, but the tribunal left the original award in place. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,322
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £211,384
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 70 interests of justice
- supervening event
- s.123 ERA 1996
- Wood v Mitchell SA Ltd
- Aegon UK Corp Services Ltd v Roberts
- Employment Tribunals; Principles for Compensating Pension Loss 2017
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.