Case 4105116/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105116/2020 Mr S Leckie v Albert Bartlett Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105116/2020
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105116/2020 Mr S Leckie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal listed a case management preliminary hearing for 27 November 2020. The claimant did not complete or submit the agenda in advance of that hearing and did not participate in the hearing itself.
The Tribunal later wrote to the claimant on 2 February 2021 asking whether he wished to continue with the claim. No response was received. Further reminders were sent on 23 April 2021 and 18 May 2021, and those letters also received no reply.
On 15 June 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 29 June 2021 or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant again did not reply.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the basis that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out before any merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action before striking it out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.