Case 4105129/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105129/2022 Mr A McClurg v Enermech Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105129/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105129/2022 Mr A McClurg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr A McClurg's claim against Enermech Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. It held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success under rule 37(1)(a) and that there had been non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal dated 30 November 2022 under rule 37(1)(c).
The reasons record that, on 20 December 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 5 January 2023 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 9 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(a) and rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(a) no reasonable prospect of success
- rule 37(1)(c) non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.