Case 4105162/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Bell v TC Inn Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105162/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Bell's sole complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, relating to holiday pay, succeeded. The tribunal ordered TC Inn Limited to pay her £889.71 gross, finding that this amount had been unlawfully deducted from her wages contrary to section 13 ERA 1996.
The judgment also allowed the respondent to deduct any Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions required by law before payment, with payment of the balance satisfying the order. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written judgment records that no further written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes the complaint as a section 23 ERA 1996 complaint in relation to holiday pay and orders payment of £889.71 gross, described as an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to s13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £890 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £890
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.