Case 4105164/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Johnston v The Scottish Ministers — 2025
- Case reference
- 4105164/2024
- Decision date
- 8 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Residential Officer at HMP Grampian and was summarily dismissed after an audit showed she had accessed numerous prisoner records, including records of prisoners outside her area of responsibility and outside HMP Grampian. The respondent said the dismissal was for conduct relating to inappropriate access to prisoner records without a legitimate operational need or authorisation.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal found conduct was a potentially fair reason under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Applying Burchell, it found the respondent genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and had carried out a reasonable investigation through the audit, Conduct Unit investigation, disciplinary hearing and appeal. The tribunal rejected the claimant's arguments that there was evidence of bias by Mr Campbell, that the investigation was insufficient, or that dismissal was outside the range of reasonable responses.
For wrongful dismissal, the tribunal made its own finding that the claimant had fundamentally breached her contract by accessing prisoner records on multiple occasions while knowing she was breaching the respondent's rules. It found that this released the respondent from the obligation to give notice or payment in lieu, so the wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed for conduct and dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not wrongfully dismissed and was not entitled to notice or payment in lieu because she had materially breached her contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.98(1) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt [2003] IRLR 23
- band of reasonable responses
- British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift [1981] IRLR 91
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones [1982] IRLR 439
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.