Case 4105182/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105182/2024 Mr L M Brea de Orlandi v Viva Italia Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105182/2024
- Decision date
- 16 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105182/2024 Mr L M Brea de Orlandi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented. The Employment Judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and had failed to pay the holiday pay to which he was entitled. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,951.64.
The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed. The hearing listed for 21 August 2024 was cancelled. The judgment is dated 15 August 2024 and was entered in the register on 16 August 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; the judgment did not split the monetary award between this finding and the holiday pay finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the holiday pay to which the claimant was entitled; the judgment did not split the monetary award between this finding and the unlawful deduction finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,952
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.