Case 4105196/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4105196/2017 Ms C McMahon v Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4105196/2017
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4105196/2017 Ms C McMahon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and the Tribunal sent a strike out warning letter on 19 February 2025 after the claimant did not respond to a status enquiry asking her to confirm her intentions for the claim.
The correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1. The claimant had not given the Tribunal a new address, leaving the Tribunal unable to communicate with her or give notice under rule 38(2). The Tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 38(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment identifies the matter only as 'the claim' and strikes it out for not being actively pursued. The equal pay classification is supported by the supplied listing category, not by detailed reasoning in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
- rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.