Case 4105212/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Kokaine v Daru Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105212/2023
- Decision date
- 22 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kokaine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Doherty, held that Ms Kokaine was automatically unfairly dismissed under section 104(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded a compensatory award of £10,449.80. The judgment extract records that reasons were provided orally, so it does not set out the detailed factual reasoning in writing.
The tribunal also found that the respondents had failed to provide a statement of particulars of employment and made an award of 4 weeks' pay under section 38(4)(b) of the Employment Act 2002, in the sum of £761.32. In addition, it found a failure to provide itemised pay statements required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £761.32 under section 12(4) of that Act.
Finally, the tribunal held that the claimant had accrued annual leave under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 that had not been taken by the date of termination, and ordered payment of £413 under regulation 16. The respondent did not appear at the hearing. The total monetary awards recorded in the judgment therefore came to £12,385.44.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfairly dismissed under section 104(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; compensatory award of £10,449.80. | Upheld | — | £10,450 |
| Other | Failure to provide a statement of particulars of employment; award of 4 weeks' pay under section 38(4)(b) of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £761 |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; award under section 12(4) of that Act. | Upheld | — | £761 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued annual leave under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 had not been taken by the date of termination; payment ordered under regulation 16. | Upheld | — | £413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,385
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,450
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.104(1)(b) ERA 1996
- s.38(4)(b) Employment Act 2002
- s.8 ERA 1996
- s.12(4) ERA 1996
- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.