Case 4105220/2018 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Mr A Gray v McConnell Timber Engineering Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105220/2018
- Decision date
- 1 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Mr A Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge M Robison found for the claimant, Mr A Gray, against McConnell Timber Engineering Ltd. The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £642.72.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £642.72. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £321.36.
The hearing listed for 15 August 2018 was cancelled. The awards total £1,606.80.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded damages for notice pay after the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £643 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £643 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £321 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,607
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.