Case 4105222/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4105222/2016 Mr A Frances v Represented by: Ms P Cunningham Solicitor Amec Foster Wheeler Group Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105222/2016
- Decision date
- 3 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4105222/2016 Mr A Frances
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Nicol dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or disputed facts are recorded in the extracted text. The decision is confined to the procedural disposal following withdrawal, with no award made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim. It states only that 'the claim' was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but that is not stated in the extracted judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.