Case 4105223/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Crowe v Silverwood Management Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105223/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Crowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Silverwood Management Limited. It then found that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The decision was given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided unless requested.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £833.60 as damages for breach of contract. The figure was calculated by reference to £10.42 per hour, 40 hours per week, and two weeks' notice. The tribunal stated that it used gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was held well-founded. The tribunal awarded £833.60 as damages, calculated as £10.42 per hour x 40 hours per week x 2 weeks, using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £834 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £834
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.