Case 4105225/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Christine Mireille Gonda v The Royal an Lochan — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105225/2016
- Decision date
- 19 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Christine Mireille Gonda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Glasgow on 3 February 2017 before Employment Judge Shona MacLean. The claimant sought leave to amend her claim from ordinary unfair dismissal to unfair dismissal due to assertion of a statutory right. The respondent opposed the amendment and relied, among other matters, on the earlier tribunal judgment in case 4102638/2016.
The tribunal found that the claimant began work on 20 October 2014 and that her employment ended after the respondent’s dismissal letter dated 9 September 2016. It held that the proposed amendment was substantial because the original claim form did not identify the statutory right relied on, nor when, where, or to whom it had been asserted. The tribunal also found that the facts underlying the proposed amendment were already within the claimant’s knowledge when she presented the original claim.
Applying rule 29 and the overriding objective, the tribunal balanced the interests of justice and the relative hardship to the parties. It accepted that the claimant would not be able to pursue an ordinary unfair dismissal claim because she lacked sufficient qualifying service, but it held that allowing the amendment would require further clarification, case management, delay, and expense. The tribunal also noted the earlier judgment’s findings that there were no guaranteed hours and that the redundancy explanation was supported by the findings in that case, so any compensatory award was likely to be little or none. The application to amend was refused, and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant sought to amend the claim to allege dismissal for asserting a statutory right, but the tribunal refused leave to amend. It then dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service, so the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 29
- rule 2 overriding objective
- Margaret Forrest Case Management v Kennedy
- Newsquest Ltd v Keeping
- Woodside v Hampshire Hospital
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.