Case 4105238/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gabriel Iancu v Thornhill Leisure (Mormond Inn) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105238/2022
- Decision date
- 22 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gabriel Iancu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Gabriel Iancu, worked for Thornhill Leisure Ltd from 28 October 2021 as a Shift Manager at the Riverside Inn. The tribunal accepted his evidence and the payslips he produced. It found that he was paid mainly at £10 per hour, sometimes at £11 per hour without explanation, and that his final payslip showed net wages of £1,173.93 for work done from 27 April 2022 to the end of his employment, but that amount was not paid into his bank account.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered payment of £1,173.93. It also upheld the holiday pay claim under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. On the evidence accepted by the tribunal, the claimant had taken no paid leave during his 27-week employment and was entitled to 15 days’ accrued but untaken leave, calculated as three weeks’ gross pay at £367.02 per week, giving £1,101.06.
The tribunal further upheld the breach of contract claim for failure to give statutory notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice, did not receive it, and awarded £367.02 in gross damages. The total award was £2,641.01, with the tribunal stating that deductions for PAYE and national insurance could be made from the gross holiday and notice sums only if the respondent complied with the directions given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant’s final wages for work done from 26 April 2022 to the end of employment, shown on the final payslip, had not been paid into his bank account. | Upheld | — | £1,174 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to accrued but untaken holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded three weeks’ gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,101 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and had not received it, so it awarded gross damages for that breach. | Upheld | — | £367 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,641
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.