Case 4105259/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Gallacher v Bobby Store Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105259/2016
- Decision date
- 9 January 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Gallacher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Bobby Store Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £26.80. It also accepted the claimant's claim for 3 weeks statutory sick pay, treating that as an unlawful deduction from wages under section 27 of the Employment Rights Act, and ordered payment of £265.35, calculated at £85.45 per week.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £27 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for 3 weeks statutory sick pay, described by the tribunal as an unlawful deduction from wages under s.27 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £265 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £134 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £586
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.