Case 4105265/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4105265/2020 (V) Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on August 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr A Formella v Represented by:15 Ms Kwiatowska ` Nor-Sea Foods Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105265/2020
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4105265/2020 (V) Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on August 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr A Formella
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a disability discrimination claim brought by Mr A Formella against Nor-Sea Foods Limited. The sole issue was disability status. Mr Formella said he suffered from back pain, had undergone surgery for curvature of the spine about seven years earlier, and used pain relief medication. He worked as a General Operative in physically demanding duties, including lifting, pushing trolleys, and other heavy work in the High Care Department.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant’s back pain was an impairment for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. However, it was not satisfied that the impairment had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The tribunal noted the lack of medical evidence, including no medical report and no disability impact statement, and found that the claimant had been able to do physically demanding work for the respondent for a significant period while managing symptoms with painkillers.
The tribunal did not accept the claimant’s evidence that his condition only deteriorated significantly in the two weeks before 8 June 2020 and continued in that way thereafter. It regarded that account as not credible or reliable, and said it was contradicted by the claimant’s own self-certification form dated 8 June 2020. On the evidence accepted, episodes of pain were sporadic and managed with medication, which did not amount to a substantial adverse effect.
Because the claimant did not meet the statutory definition of disability, the claim of disability discrimination was dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The sole issue was whether the claimant had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal accepted that his back pain was an impairment, but found that he had not shown a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v The Patent Office [1999] IRLR 4 EAT
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.