Case 4105269/2016 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No :- 4105269/2016 Mr M Ross v Represented by: Mr R Russell Solicitor Dingbro Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105269/2016
- Decision date
- 10 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No :- 4105269/2016 Mr M Ross
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a single-claim case brought by Mr M Ross against Dingbro Limited. The judgment records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The Employment Tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge sitting alone, dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the judgment text.
No remedy or monetary award is set out in the judgment. The judgment was dated 10 March 2017 and entered in the register on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal record states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.