Case 4105286/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Moore v The County Hotel — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105286/2016
- Decision date
- 6 January 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal found that Mr I Moore was unfairly dismissed by The County Hotel. It also found that he was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered a basic award of £4,320, calculated as £216 x 20 weeks, and a monetary award of £4,572.04 on the unfair dismissal claim. It separately ordered damages of £2,909.48 for notice pay, calculated as 14 weeks x £207.82.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the claimant's tribunal fee of £250. The extracted judgment does not set out any further liability reasoning beyond these orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awards a basic award of £4,320 and a monetary award of £4,572.04 on this unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | £8,892 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for notice pay, calculated in the judgment as 14 weeks x £207.82. | Upheld | — | £2,909 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,052
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,320
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,572
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.