Case 4105298/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Robertson v Arjowiggins Scotland Ltd (in administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105298/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Robertson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Robison issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material after the respondent did not enter proceedings and no response form was submitted. The respondent was in administration, but the administrator consented to continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 23 November 2022.
The tribunal found that Mr Robertson was entitled to bring the claim because none of the situations in section 189(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 applied. Although the respondent had a collective agreement with Unite the Union for manual workers, Mr Robertson worked as an IT Analyst and was not of a description in respect of which an independent trade union was recognised.
Mr Robertson was dismissed as redundant on 22 September 2022 at Stoneywood Mill. The tribunal found that the respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant more than 20 employees at that establishment within 90 days or less, and that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULRCA 1992 by consulting affected employees before the first dismissal took effect was well founded.
The tribunal made a protective award in respect of Mr Robertson and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period. The protected period began on 22 September 2022 and lasted for 90 days. No monetary amount was stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment adjudicated a protective award complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The locked taxonomy has no separate protective_award category, so this is classified as other rather than redundancy_pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.189(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.