Case 4105302/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Frood v Ms Fiona Burton (formerly T/a The Stag Bar) — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105302/2016
- Decision date
- 22 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Frood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn reconsideration, Employment Judge Garvie revoked the earlier default judgment and allowed the respondent to lodge an ET3 within 28 days. The earlier default award, which had granted £432 notice pay, £432 redundancy pay and a £160 lodging fee, was therefore set aside. The tribunal also directed that, once the response was received, the claim and response would be served on Hawthorn Leisure Ltd, which was to be sisted as a second respondent.
At the hearing, the claimant accepted that her notice pay complaint was out of time. Her employment ended on 19 June 2016, but she did not contact ACAS until 12 October 2016, which meant she could not obtain the benefit of the section 207B time extension. The tribunal therefore treated the notice pay complaint as withdrawn and dismissed it.
The remaining complaint was for a redundancy payment. The tribunal recorded that this had been submitted in time because the relevant time limit was six months, and it did not determine entitlement on that issue at this stage. The respondent said she had been a sole trader trading as The Stag Bar and that there may have been a transfer to Hawthorn Leisure Ltd; the tribunal identified possible preliminary issues of whether there had been a TUPE transfer, when any transfer took effect, and whether, if there was no transfer, the claimant remained employed by the respondent until termination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint. The claimant accepted it was time-barred because her employment ended on 19 June 2016 and she first contacted ACAS on 12 October 2016, too late to obtain the section 207B extension. The tribunal treated the complaint as withdrawn and accordingly dismissed it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 207B of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.