Case 4105315/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Duncan v Caledonian Manpower Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105315/2023
- Decision date
- 17 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Edinburgh before Employment Judge Sangster, gave oral reasons at the hearing and held that the respondent had not paid the claimant his full holiday entitlement on termination of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay £211.33 gross in respect of the underpaid holiday entitlement, with liberty to deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions if required by law before payment.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay employer and employee contributions to the respondent’s pension provider in respect of the claimant. It ordered damages of £817.77 for that breach.
The claimant’s wrongful dismissal complaint was dismissed. The judgment records no discrimination issues and no separate award of interest or other additional remedy beyond the two sums ordered above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent did not pay the claimant his full holiday entitlement on termination of employment and ordered payment of a gross sum, subject to tax and employee NIC deductions if required by law. | Upheld | — | £211 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay employer and employee pension contributions to the respondent’s pension provider in respect of the claimant. | Upheld | — | £818 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant’s complaint of wrongful dismissal did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,029
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.