Case 4105345/2017 · Employment Tribunal
R Gall Miss J Watson v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105345/2017
- Decision date
- 15 January 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
R Gall Miss J Watson
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was listed for 11 January 2018 in Glasgow before Employment Judge Robert Gall. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal noted that the claimant had not given a telephone contact number on the claim form, so the clerk sent an e-mail soon after 10am asking her to contact the tribunal by telephone. By 10.30am there had been no response. The respondent appeared through Mr Stewart, who said that any sums the respondent regarded as payable had been paid.
The tribunal considered the claim form and response and noted that the response appeared to accept that an element of wages was due, while there was a dispute about holiday pay and any payment in respect of notice. No evidence was tested because the claimant was absent and had given no explanation for not attending. Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. The tribunal did not determine the merits. The response indicated that an element of wages was said to be due, but the tribunal did not test that evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. The tribunal noted there was a dispute as to holiday pay, but it did not reach a merits finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. The tribunal noted there was a dispute about any payment in respect of notice, but it did not determine the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.