Case 4105346/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105346/2013 Ms P McColm v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Dumfries & Galloway Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105346/2013
- Decision date
- 8 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105346/2013 Ms P McColm
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms P McColm's claim against Dumfries and Galloway Council had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Frances Eccles dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim beyond the case listing context, so no further finding on liability or remedy is recorded in the text supplied. The judgment was dated 8 March 2017 and entered in the register and copied to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. It states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.