Case 4105387/2017 · Employment Tribunal
: Mrs J Ward Mr J Burnett Miss A Boyle v Miss A Carroll — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105387/2017
- Decision date
- 4 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Members
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Mrs J Ward, Mr J Burnett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
: Mrs J Ward Mr J Burnett Miss A Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found in the claimant's favour on two monetary claims. It held that, on termination, the respondent had failed to pay the full amount due for accrued paid annual leave under regulations 13 and/or 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and awarded £14,035 gross, described as two days' pay. It also upheld the claim that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and awarded £560 under section 38(2) of the Employment Act 2002.
The tribunal dismissed the claim that the respondent refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to annual leave under regulations 13 and/or 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It also dismissed the claim that the respondent failed to provide written itemised pay statements under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The separate claim for other unlawful deductions from wages during the first five weeks after the claimant returned from maternity leave was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed accordingly.
The tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to rest breaks under regulation 12 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, but it made only a declaration and no award of compensation. It also refused permission to re-amend the claim so as to advance an alternative maternity discrimination case based on working conditions and the allocation of duties.
The pregnancy discrimination claim had been withdrawn before the hearing and was dismissed to the extent not already disposed of. The separate maternity discrimination claim considered at the preliminary hearing before EJ Wallington QC on 12 January 2018 failed and was dismissed. The only monetary awards recorded in the judgment were £14,035 gross and £560, making a total award of £14,595.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim that the respondent failed, on termination, to pay the full amount due in respect of accrued paid annual leave under regulations 13 and/or 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to two days' pay and ordered payment of £14,035 gross. | Upheld | — | £14,035 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for other unlawful deductions from wages during the first five weeks after the claimant returned from maternity leave was withdrawn at the hearing and was dismissed accordingly. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim that the respondent refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to annual leave under regulations 13 and/or 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claim that the respondent refused to permit the claimant to exercise her right to rest breaks under regulation 12 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. The tribunal made a declaration to that effect but did not award compensation. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The claim that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of the particulars of her employment was admitted and succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £560, representing four weeks' gross pay under section 38(2) of the Employment Act 2002. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,595
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- regulations 13 and/or 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 12 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38(2) of the Employment Act 2002
- section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.