Case 4105389/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No:4105389/2023 Mr L Brown v JRS Electerical and Mechanical Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105389/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No:4105389/2023 Mr L Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 21 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge L Doherty issued judgment without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 29 November 2023.
The tribunal found that Mr L Brown was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent, JRS Electerical and Mechanical Ltd, was ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £1,172.25.
No other claims or remedy components are recorded in the extracted judgment text. The judgment is dated 7 November 2023 and entered in the register on 9 November 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment entered on the available material; the tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,172.25. | Upheld | — | £1,172 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,172
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.