Case 4105391/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4105391/2018 & 4113829/2018 Ms S Boyle v Cordia Services LLP Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4105391/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4105391/2018 & 4113829/2018 Ms S Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the ground that they had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons state that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, a strike-out warning letter was sent after the claimant failed to respond to a status enquiry, and that correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided. The claimant had not supplied a new address, leaving the Tribunal unable to communicate with her or give notice under rule 38(2). The Tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claims and struck them out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment refers only to "the claims" being struck out; the equal pay classification is supported by the listing category and Layer 1 context rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules
- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 38(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.