Case 4105400/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Self-Represented 15 Argyll College UHI v Represented by Mr Mitchell (Solicitor) 20 — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105400/2023
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Neil Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Self-Represented 15 Argyll College UHI
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Glasgow via CVP on 13 December 2023 before Employment Judge Neil Buzzard. The claimant, Mr C S MacLeod, brought claims against Argyll College UHI. The tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying complaint because the claims were found to have been presented outside the applicable time limit.
The judgment records that it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time. On that basis, the claims were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded, and the decision does not record any split of compensation or any other remedy calculation.
The judgment is a short preliminary decision dealing only with time limits. It does not set out any separate legal tests by name, and it does not record any lay members sitting with the judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claims were presented outside the time limit and it was found that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.