Case 4105409/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Perfect Fit Scotland Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105409/2022
- Decision date
- 15 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages after the respondent did not enter a Notice of Appearance. At the final hearing, the claimant said his normal weekly pay was £666 gross and that 20% CIS tax had been deducted because he had been registered by the respondent as a sub-contractor. He said he had tried to recover the week’s lying time withheld on termination of his contract, without success, and produced text messages in which the respondent accepted the sums were due and would be paid.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted one week’s pay from the claimant’s wages. It accepted that there was no valid reason for the respondent to withhold the sums and held that this amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages within section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £536 net in compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted one week’s net pay from the claimant’s wages, contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £536 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £536
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £536
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.