Case 4105423/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105423/2022 Mr H Wearing v Apex Decor Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105423/2022
- Decision date
- 17 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105423/2022 Mr H Wearing
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent. The claimant, Mr H Wearing, brought a claim against Apex Decor Ltd, and the Employment Judge recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,228.70. The judgment states that this figure was calculated as 10 years x 1.5 x £148.58.
No other claim outcome, legal test, or separate remedy component is stated in the extracted judgment text. The decision was dated 11 November 2022 and entered in the register on 17 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; no response presented by the respondent. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,228.70, calculated as 10 years x 1.5 x £148.58. | Upheld | — | £2,229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,229
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.