Case 4105430/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Muir v Muir Slicer Associates Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105430/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Muir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAll five claimants' employment ended on 27 February 2023 after Ms Marie Muir emailed that the respondent was unable to continue in business and had ceased to trade. The tribunal found that the claimants then took steps to seek advice from ACAS, the CAB and solicitors, and that the claims were lodged between 21 September and 18 October 2023.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal, breach of contract/notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay claims were out of time. Applying the 'not reasonably practicable' test as summarised in Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy and the authorities cited in the judgment, it found that the claimants knew they should seek advice but did not act on it in time, so their ignorance of the time limits was not reasonable. Those claims were therefore dismissed.
For redundancy pay, the tribunal applied s.164 ERA 1996 and the early conciliation extension. It held that the first, second, fourth and fifth claimants' redundancy claims were in time when presented on 21 September 2023, and that Miss Horsley's late claim could still succeed because it was just and equitable for her to receive a redundancy payment. Under s.162 ERA 1996, using the statutory cap of £571 a week and each claimant's continuous service, it awarded £15,988 to Ms E Muir, £15,000 to Mr A Spicer, £2,430 to Miss Horsley, £1,795.50 to Miss Beggs and £13,511.17 to Mr J D Maxwell, a total of £48,724.67.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; lodged out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Lodged out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay claim under s.23 ERA 1996; lodged out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Lodged out of time; the tribunal rejected the 'not reasonably practicable' argument. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy claims succeeded; the first, second, fourth and fifth claimants were in time, and Miss Horsley's late claim was allowed on a just and equitable basis. Separate awards were £15,988, £15,000, £2,430, £1,795.50 and £13,511.17. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £48,725
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490
- Marks and Spencer plc v Williams-Ryan [2005] EWCA Civ 479
- Dedman v British Building & Engineering Appliances Ltd [1974] ICR 53
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119
- Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan [1979] ICR 52
- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- Article 7 Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- reg. 30(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.164 ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.