Case 4105433/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Kevin Horner v World Duty Free Group UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105433/2020
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Tinnion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Kevin Horner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard via CVP on 6 January 2021 before Employment Judge A. Tinnion. The respondent had conceded liability and disputed quantum only in respect of both claimants' claims, as recorded in the email sent to the Glasgow Employment Tribunal on 5 January 2021 at 16:41.
The tribunal held that James Kevin Horner's complaint, identified as a failure to pay in full 8 weeks' contractual notice pay entitlement, was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay him £652.69.
The tribunal held that Daniel McIntyre's complaint, identified as a failure to pay in full 10 weeks' contractual notice pay entitlement, was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay him £1,668.21. No separate statutory remedy components were set out in the judgment beyond these contractual sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | James Kevin Horner: complaint was failure to pay in full 8 weeks contractual notice pay entitlement. | Upheld | — | £653 |
| Breach of contract | Daniel McIntyre: complaint was failure to pay in full 10 weeks contractual notice pay entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,668 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,321
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.