Case 4105457/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohammed Saife v Ms Cochrane Solicitor EntServe UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105457/2020
- Decision date
- 20 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohammed Saife
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 3 June 2021, Employment Judge McManus considered the claimant's application to amend the discrimination ET1 and the respondent's application to strike out the race discrimination claim as out of time. The claimant had lodged the ET1 on 9 October 2020 after ACAS early conciliation, and the discrimination case was later clarified as a race discrimination claim only. The conjoined unfair dismissal claim was also before the tribunal, but no merits evidence was heard.
The tribunal treated the January and February 2021 further particulars as the amendment sought. Applying the Selkent factors, it held that the proposed amendments did not add a new cause of action but gave further factual detail to the existing section 13 Equality Act 2010 race discrimination claim, including allegations about exclusion from meetings on 23 and 24 March 2020 and delegation of responsibility on or around 6 September 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent had already had the opportunity to respond in its ET3 and that allowing the amendment would not cause unfair prejudice.
The strike-out application was refused. The tribunal applied the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time-limit provisions and the authorities it cited on continuing acts and strike out, and held that the claimant had a reasonably arguable basis for saying the alleged incidents were linked as a continuing course of conduct. The race discrimination claim was therefore not struck out, and the question whether the claim was in time was left for the final hearing. The judgment also records that the claims would proceed to further case management and a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal allowed the ET1 to be amended in terms of the January and February 2021 further particulars and refused the respondent's strike-out application. No final merits decision was made at this preliminary hearing; the race discrimination claim was listed to proceed to further case management and a final hearing, where continuing course of conduct and time bar remained live issues. | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | This conjoined unfair dismissal claim was to proceed to a final hearing. The judgment contains no merits determination or remedy on the dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd t/a Stagecoach Selkent v Moore
- Ladbrokes Racing Ltd v Traynor
- Ali v Office of National Statistics
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Hendricks v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
- Rule 37(1)(a) no reasonable prospects of success
- E v X, L & Z
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.