Case 4105460/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Al Mousawi other v Represented by: Ms P Cunningham Solicitor Mason Land Surveys Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4105460/2017
- Decision date
- 18 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Al Mousawi other
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo responses were presented to the claims, so Employment Judge Shona MacLean issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material on 12 December 2017. The first claimant and the 21 other claimants listed in the attached schedule were represented by Ms P Cunningham, solicitor, and the respondent was not represented.
The tribunal found that the complaint that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188(1B)(b)(ii) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It held that a protective award should be made in respect of the first claimant and the 21 other claimants who had been dismissed as redundant by the respondent on 6 July 2017.
The protected period was fixed at 90 days beginning on 6 July 2017. The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the appropriate remuneration under section 190 of the 1992 Act. The extracted text does not state a numerical amount for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 188(1B)(b)(ii) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the extracted text does not state any monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- section 188(1B)(b)(ii) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.