Case 4105460/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Mengqi Yuan v Wangping Travel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105460/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Mengqi Yuan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaints were presented within the time limit in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It upheld the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint for arrears of pay between 19 March 2020 and 6 July 2020 and ordered Wangping Travel Limited to pay £2,883.20 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions and written intimation of any deductions to the claimant.
It also upheld the breach of contract complaint for notice pay and ordered £1,360 gross, and found the claim for a statutory redundancy payment well founded, ordering £470.76. A further unauthorised deduction from wages complaint for holiday pay between 19 March 2020 and 6 August 2020 was upheld and £303.55 gross was ordered. The separate complaint of compensation under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of arrears of pay between 19 March 2020 and 6 July 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,883 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,360 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £471 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay between 19 March 2020 and 6 August 2020. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Other | Complaint of compensation pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,018
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.