Case 4105464/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Diana Adomaitis v Black Arrow Financial Solutions — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105464/2023
- Decision date
- 22 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Diana Adomaitis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Diana Adomaitis brought the claim against Black Arrow Financial Solutions. The respondent did not appear at the final hearing, so the case proceeded undefended under Rule 21. The tribunal accepted the claimant as a credible and reliable witness and noted that the documentation used different versions of the respondent's name, but was satisfied that the trading name used in the proceedings was sufficient for judgment.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not been paid salary for June and July 2023 and for 1 to 26 August 2023. It concluded that the sums due totalled £12,604.16, awarded gross and subject to appropriate statutory deductions, and held that those unpaid sums were each unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and breaches of contract.
The tribunal also found that a contractual bonus of £1,000 had been confirmed to the claimant on 21 December 2022 and had not been paid. It awarded that sum gross, subject to statutory deductions, and treated it as a sum due on termination within the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994. It further found that the car-allowance payments of £500 per month had ceased after April 2023 and awarded £2,384.62 without deduction for the unpaid allowance.
The claimant asked for compensation for mental distress and financial consequences, but the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to make such an award. It considered the possibility of a financial penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, but deferred that question for one month to allow the respondent to make written representations, including on financial circumstances, by 4pm on 22 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid salary for June, July and 1-26 August 2023; the tribunal also said these sums were unlawful deductions from wages and breaches of contract, and the award was subject to appropriate statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £12,604 |
| Breach of contract | Bonus awarded under the contract after the respondent told the claimant on 21 December 2022 that she was to be paid a bonus of £1,000; awarded gross subject to statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Breach of contract | Car-allowance/expenses claim. The tribunal accepted that the allowance had been paid until April 2023 and then ceased, and it awarded £2,384.62 without deduction. The written reasons state the calculation as due from 1 April 2023 to 26 April 2023, which appears inconsistent with the surrounding facts referring to termination on 26 August 2023. | Upheld | — | £2,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,989
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.