Case 4105480/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shazia Hameed v Auto Assist (Scotland) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105480/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shazia Hameed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Miss Hameed's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for arrears of pay covering 2 June 2020 to 14 July 2020. It ordered Auto Assist (Scotland) Ltd to pay £1,147.50, subject to any required tax and national insurance deductions, and said the sum was payable immediately.
A separate complaint for unpaid wages covering 27 April 2020 to 1 June 2020 was found not well founded and was dismissed. The holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would follow only if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of arrears of pay between 2 June 2020 and 14 July 2020 was found well founded. The award was £1,147.50, subject to tax and national insurance deductions if applicable. | Upheld | — | £1,148 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint in respect of unpaid wages between 27 April 2020 and 1 June 2020 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,148
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.