Case 4105484/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Amran Amir v Taziker Industrial Limited st and 2 others — 2023

Case reference: 4105484/2022
Decision date: 18 April 2023
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Ian McPherson

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mr Amran Amir

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the victimisation claim against Taziker Industrial Limited, brought under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. That head of complaint was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The tribunal stated that the part-withdrawal related only to the victimisation complaint and did not affect the claimant's harassment claim against Taziker Industrial Limited under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. That harassment claim was to proceed to the previously ordered Preliminary Hearing on 25 May 2023.

The claimant's solicitor also withdrew the whole claims against Coyle Personnel Limited and Unity Contracting Services Limited. Those claims were dismissed in their entirety under Rule 52. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Victimisation	The victimisation claim against Taziker Industrial Limited, under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, was withdrawn by the claimant's solicitor and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that this part-withdrawal related only to that head of complaint and did not affect the harassment claim against the first respondent.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The whole claims against Coyle Personnel Limited, the second respondent, were withdrawn by the claimant's solicitor and dismissed in their entirety under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The whole claims against Unity Contracting Services Limited, the third respondent, were withdrawn by the claimant's solicitor and dismissed in their entirety under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.