Case 4105484/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105484/2024 Mr G K Hay v Mowi Scotland Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4105484/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4105484/2024 Mr G K Hay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal listed a preliminary hearing for 14 November 2024. On 1 November 2024 the claimant’s representative confirmed they were no longer acting and that the claimant had been informed of possible sources of assistance. The claimant did not correspond with the tribunal, did not lodge a completed case management agenda, and did not contact the tribunal to say that he would not attend or could not attend the preliminary hearing.
The preliminary hearing took place in the claimant’s absence on 14 November 2024, and Employment Judge Macleod directed that a strike out warning be issued. On 19 November 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant until 3 December 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested, so the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not set out the underlying substantive claim labels; it strikes out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.