Case 4105502/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Coyle v Ltd (In Liquidation) and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 4105502/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Coyle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing concerned only the claimant's application for interim relief against the first respondent. No witness evidence was heard and the tribunal made no findings in fact. The underlying claims included sex and disability discrimination and automatically unfair dismissal said to arise from protected disclosures, but the claimant had less than two years' service and no standard unfair dismissal claim was before the tribunal.
The tribunal considered whether it appeared likely that, at the final hearing, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the making of protected disclosures. It applied the interim relief threshold described as requiring a pretty good chance of success, on a broad assessment of the documents and submissions.
The tribunal found there were substantial disputed issues about whether the alleged disclosures amounted to disclosures of information under section 43B, whether the claimant had a reasonable belief that they were made in the public interest, to whom the alleged disclosures were made, and whether they were connected to dismissal. The tribunal also noted competing explanations about the dismissal process and the claimant's separate pleaded case that dismissal was discriminatory. On that preliminary assessment, the tribunal held that the interim relief test was not met and refused the application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal refused the claimant's application for interim relief under sections 128-130 Employment Rights Act 1996, made pursuant to an automatically unfair dismissal claim under section 103A. The underlying automatically unfair dismissal, discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims were not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- sections 128-130 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- pretty good chance of success
- Taplin v C Shippam Ltd
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz
- His Highness Sheikh Bin Sadr al Qasimi v Robinson
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.