Case 4105507/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Onsite PM Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105507/2022
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Finn brought a claim saying she had not been paid for a period of notice and for holidays. The respondent did not enter a response and did not appear at the hearing on 6 January 2023, so the tribunal heard evidence from the claimant only.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed from 27 March 2022 to 11 August 2022, that she earned £1,666 gross per month and £1,433 net per month, and that she had worked one week at the start of her employment without payment on the understanding it would be paid at the end. It also found that she gave two weeks' notice, worked one week of that notice, and did not receive payment for the second week.
The tribunal accepted that she had not been paid for the lying week and that she had four days of accrued but unpaid holiday at termination. It recorded the claimant's own calculation of £392.15 for the notice week, £392.15 for the lying time, and £313.72 for holiday pay, and found the claims were well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,098.02 gross, described as payment for one week of notice, one week of wages, and four days of holiday. The judgment did not apportion the total award between the individual heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award covered one week's notice pay and one week's wages (described as lying time); the judgment did not split the sum between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Award covered four days' accrued but unpaid holiday; the judgment did not split the sum between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,098
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.