Case 4105508/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105508/2022 Mr D Gisbey v JG Wealth Management Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4105508/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105508/2022 Mr D Gisbey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 on 13 June 2023. The tribunal found that Mr D Gisbey had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered JG Wealth Management Limited to pay damages of £3,997, calculated by reference to 7 weeks' notice pay at £571 per week.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay a redundancy payment and ordered it to pay £3,997, calculated as 7 years x £571. No separate interest or other heads of award are recorded in the judgment. The total monetary award recorded from the two findings is £7,994.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were assessed at £3,997, described as 7 weeks' notice pay x £571. | Upheld | — | £3,997 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay a redundancy payment. The award was £3,997, calculated as 7 years x £571. | Upheld | — | £3,997 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,994
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.