Case 4105544/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105544/2017 Mr A Reid v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105544/2017
- Decision date
- 14 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105544/2017 Mr A Reid
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr A Reid's claim against The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability findings are set out in the text, and no monetary award was made.
The document is a one-page judgment entered by Employment Judge MacLean and copied to the parties on 14 September 2018. It does not identify any lay members, any remedy calculation, or any discrimination characteristic.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action. It states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.