Case 4105546/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Case Number: 4105546/2018 & 4113932/2018 Ms C Burrows v Cordia Services LLP Glasgow City Council — 2025

Case reference: 4105546/2018
Decision date: 14 March 2025
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Frances Eccles

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Case Number: 4105546/2018 & 4113932/2018 Ms C Burrows

Respondent

Cordia Services LLP Glasgow City Council

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out the claims under rule 38 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 on the ground that the claims had not been actively pursued.

The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and the claimant did not reply to a Tribunal status enquiry asking her to confirm her intentions regarding the claims. A strike out warning letter sent on 7 February 2025 was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1, and she had not given the Tribunal a new address. The Tribunal stated that it could not communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 38(2), and assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claims.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Equal pay	The listing category indicates Equal Pay Act and the judgment refers collectively to the claims. The tribunal struck out the claims under rule 38(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.