Case 4105553/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105553/2022 Miss S Milligan v Brite Technical Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4105553/2022
- Decision date
- 23 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4105553/2022 Miss S Milligan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Brite Technical Services Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss S Milligan's wages and ordered payment of £1,280.40 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £807.69 gross. Those two claims were upheld and no separate apportionment of the awards was set out beyond the amounts awarded on each head.
The claimant's further complaint about an alleged failure to enrol her in a pension scheme was dismissed because it was not a matter within the tribunal's jurisdiction. The listed hearing for 10 January 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,280.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,280 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £807.69 gross. | Upheld | — | £808 |
| Other | The claimant's allegation that the respondent failed to enrol her in a pension scheme was dismissed because it was not a matter within the tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,088
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.