Case 4105560/2017 · Employment Tribunal
D O’Dempsey i o v Mrs W Davie and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 4105560/2017
- Decision date
- 9 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed for the purposes of section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the reason for dismissal was some other substantial reason. On that basis, the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal succeeded.
For remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £7,868.24 and a compensatory element of £4,683.14. It found that the claimant's employment would have continued until 2 November 2017. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations apply and that the prescribed period is from 25 July 2017 to 17 October 2017. The respondent title was amended to Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Limited.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the recoupment regulations apply and that the prescribed period is from 25 July 2017 to 17 October 2017. | Upheld | — | £12,551 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,551
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,868
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,683
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.